Abstract
The NIST Privacy Framework describes itself as a comprehensive approach to organization-wide privacy program management. However, inferences can yield sensitive information of identities or attributes from nonsensitive information. Privacy governance must protect this information. Although many people and organizations are expanding their privacy definitions to include inferences, our gap analysis reveals that the framework's mapped controls are insufficient for managing inference-driven risk. The framework does not attend organizational focus to privacy inference risk sufficiently to support its stated claim of comprehensive risk management. Applying the framework to past incidents where ostensibly protected information was re-inferred, we analyze how organizations can better mitigate inference-based privacy violations. Finally, we recommend detailed improvements to the framework's controls to account better for inferences. Our recommendations encompass augmenting and mapping additional privacy risk controls to increase implementing organizations' awareness of inference risks, updating controls that depend on protecting specific PII categories, and enhancing organizations' proficiency in translating legal and policy requirements into technical implementations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.