Mitigating Alarm Fatigue and Improving the Bedside Experience by Reducing Nonactionable Alarms

Abstract

To assess whether conditional bedside alarm triggers can reduce the frequency of non-actionable alarms without compromising patient safety and enhance nursing and family satisfaction. Single center, quality improvement initiative in an acute care cardiac unit (ACCU) and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Following the 4-week pre-intervention baseline period, bedside monitors were programmed with hierarchical time delay and conditional alarm triggers. Bedside alarms were tallied for 4 weeks each in the immediate post intervention period and 2-year follow-up. The primary outcome was alarms per monitored patient day. Nurses and families were surveyed pre- and post-intervention. A total of 1509 patients contributed to 2034, 1968, and 2043 monitored patient days which were evaluated in the baseline, follow-up, and 2-year follow-up periods, respectively. The median number of alarms per monitored patient day decreased by 75% in the PICU (p<0.001) and 82% in the ACCU (p<0.001) with sustained effect at 2-year follow-up. No increase of rapid response calls, emergent transfers, or code events occurred in either unit. Nursing surveys reported an improved capacity to respond to alarms and fewer perceived non-actionable alarms. Family surveys, however, did not demonstrate improved sleep quality. Implemented changes to bedside monitor alarms decreased total alarm frequency in both the acute care cardiac unit and pediatric intensive care unit, improving the care provider experience without compromising safety.