Mistakes in utilising histopathology for the management of liver disease

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Liver biopsy has become selective due to its invasiveness, potential adverse effects, patient acceptance and cost. Furthermore, the emergence of noninvasive tests (NITs) has challenged the necessity of liver biopsies in specific clinical situations. However, liver biopsy continues to play a crucial role in disease diagnosis, prognosis, and evaluating treatment compliance and response in selected patients. Areas covered In this narrative review, we discuss the errors and the shortcomings that can occur at various stages, from the initial patient selection for a liver biopsy to the final reporting phase, and strategies to address them. Clinicians and pathologists must take all necessary precautions to mitigate potential shortcomings that could compromise the value of liver biopsies. Expert opinion The increasing sophistication of NITs offers a safer, more convenient, and potentially more cost-effective approach to diagnosing chronic liver disease, especially for assessing the degree of liver fibrosis. As NITs continue to evolve, liver biopsy will likely transition to a more targeted role, ensuring optimal patient care in the ever-changing field of hepatology. However, liver biopsy will continue to have a pivotal role in assessing acute liver disease where the diagnostic yield of the liver biopsy still outweighs that of NITs.