Abstract

Simple SummaryWe studied mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency as a predictive and prognostic biomarker in endometrial carcinoma. MMR deficiency was associated with poor outcome only when p53 aberrant and polymerase-ϵ mutant tumors were excluded from the MMR proficient subgroup, in accordance with molecular classification based on The Cancer Genome Atlas. MMR deficiency was associated with an increased risk of death in the absence of various clinicopathologic risk factors, but the outcome was not worsened when such risk factors were present. The proportion of pelvic relapses and lymphatic dissemination, defined as primary lymph node involvement or relapses in regional lymph nodes, were higher in the MMR deficient subgroup. In conclusion, the effect of MMR deficiency on the outcome of endometrial carcinoma depends on how MMR proficiency is defined. MMR deficiency is associated with an increased risk of death in the absence of established risk factors and a unique pattern of disease spread.The aggressiveness of mismatch repair (MMR) deficient endometrial carcinomas was examined in a single institution retrospective study. Outcomes were similar for MMR proficient (n = 508) and deficient (n = 287) carcinomas, identified by immunohistochemistry. In accordance with molecular classification based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), tumors with abnormal p53 staining or polymerase-ϵ exonuclease domain mutation were excluded from the MMR proficient subgroup, termed as “no specific molecular profile” (NSMP). Compared with NSMP (n = 218), MMR deficiency (n = 191) was associated with poor disease-specific survival (p = 0.001). MMR deficiency was associated with an increased risk of cancer-related death when controlling for confounders (hazard ratio 2.0). In the absence of established clinicopathologic risk factors, MMR deficiency was invariably associated with an increased risk of cancer-related death in univariable analyses (hazard ratios ≥ 2.0). In contrast, outcomes for MMR deficient and NSMP subgroups did not differ when risk factors were present. Lymphatic dissemination was more common (p = 0.008) and the proportion of pelvic relapses was higher (p = 0.029) in the MMR deficient subgroup. Our findings emphasize the need for improved triage to adjuvant therapy and new therapeutic approaches in MMR deficient endometrial carcinomas.

Highlights

  • To further elucidate the role of the mismatch repair (MMR) system in determining the aggressiveness of endometrial carcinoma, we studied MMR proteins as predictive and prognostic biomarkers in a cohort that was classified into molecular subgroups based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)

  • When MMR proficient carcinomas were defined as those lacking a specific molecular profile, according to a TCGA-based approach, MMR deficiency was associated with poor survival (Figure 1, Table 3)

  • We have demonstrated that adjuvant therapies currently used in clinical practice are not associated with improved outcome in mismatch repair deficient (MMR-D) subtype endometrial carcinomas, as opposed to the NSMP subtype for which adjuvant therapies are associated with a reduced risk of cancer-related death [40]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

About 30% of endometrial carcinomas exhibit a defect in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) pathway [1]. MMR deficiency contributes to microsatellite instability (MSI), which is characterized by a high level of gene mutations [2]. MMR deficient endometrial carcinomas are mostly sporadic, resulting from hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter or less frequently from silencing of the other MMR genes MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call