Misinformation through predatory practices

Abstract

Misinformation in science can lead to erroneous conclusions with far-reaching ramifications on the impact of a given field and eventually to erosion of public trust in science. Predatory journals, the publications with dubious policies and compromised processes for review, present questionable data not rigorously evaluated. A proliferation of these journals threatens the transparency and validity of the scientific publishing system. The predatory journals are sometimes difficult to identify and both experienced and inexperienced researchers fall for them. The authors lose the opportunity to present data in credible journals with excellent viewership. The peer-review process being weak in these journals, it often leads to publications where the evidence provided is not strong enough to withstand the scrutiny of experienced researchers. Although a substantial fee is charged for publication, the quick time frame, and easy acceptance draw researchers. In a nutshell, misinformation spread through these journals, the hijacked journals and predatory conferences is damaging the entire scientific enterprise. With information on predatory journals available at trusted sites, the scientific community should make themselves aware of the journals with questionable reputations and stop publishing in these that would help stop this industry.