Abstract
A characteristic and intriguing feature of functional neurological disorder is that symptoms typically manifest with attention and improve or disappear with distraction. Attentional phenomena are therefore likely to be important in functional neurological disorder, but exactly how this manifests is unknown. The aim of the study was to establish whether in functional tremor the attentional focus is misdirected, and whether this misdirection is detrimental to the movement, or rather reflects a beneficial compensatory strategy.Patients with a functional action tremor, between the ages of 21–75, were compared to two age and gender matched control groups: healthy control participants and patients with an organic action tremor. The groups included between 17 and 28 participants. First, we compared the natural attentional focus on different aspects of a reaching movement (target, ongoing visual feedback, proprioceptive-motor aspect). This revealed that the attentional focus in the functional tremor group, in contrast to both control groups, was directed to ongoing visual feedback from the movement. Next, we established that all groups were able to shift their attentional focus to different aspects of the reaching movement when instructed. Subsequently, the impact of attentional focus on the ongoing visual feedback on movement performance was evaluated under several conditions: the reaching movement was performed with direct, or indirect visual feedback, without any visual feedback, under three different instruction conditions (as accurately as possible/very slowly/very quickly) and finally as a preparatory movement that was supposedly of no importance. Low trajectory length and low movement duration were taken as measures of good motor performance.For all three groups, motor performance deteriorated with attention to indirect visual feedback, to accuracy and when instructed to move slowly. It improved without visual feedback and when instructed to move fast. Motor performance improved, in participants with functional tremor only, when the movement was performed as a preparatory movement without any apparent importance.In addition to providing experimental evidence for improvement with distraction, we found that the normal allocation of attention during aimed movement is altered in functional tremor. Attention is disproportionately directed towards the ongoing visual feedback from the moving hand. This altered attentional focus may be partly responsible for the tremor, since it also worsens motor performance in healthy control participants and patients with an organic action tremor. It may have its detrimental impact through interference with automatic movement processes, due to a maladaptive shift from lower- to higher-level motor control circuitry.
Highlights
Functional neurological disorders are the second most common diagnosis (16%) in new patients attending neurology outpatient clinics.[1]
The functional tremor group demonstrated significantly worse detection thresholds compared to the healthy control participants with a large effect size, but the numerically worse performance in the functional tremor group compared to the organic tremor group was not statistically significant
We used spontaneous change detection of relevant movement-related signals during a reaching task to identify where patients and controls attend during reaching, and signalrelated or strategic, instructed changes in attention to investigate the effects of this attentional focus on reaching movement kinematics
Summary
Functional neurological disorders are the second most common diagnosis (16%) in new patients attending neurology outpatient clinics.[1] They lead to as severe an impairment in quality of life as the equivalent organic diseases and overall carry a poor prognosis.[2,3,4,5] Yet, as opposed to most other neurological disorders, longterm improvement or resolution of symptoms can occur, providing an extra impetus to improving treatments. A characteristic and intriguing feature of functional movement disorders is that they typically manifest with attention to the affected body part or symptom and improve or even disappear with distraction, i.e. when performed automatically.[6] In functional paralysis, for example, voluntarily movement is impaired, but normal movements occur during automatic movements; e.g. during posture readjustment, or gesturing while talking. Speech is typically normal in semi-automatic utterances. Functional tremor improves or disappears with distraction. Distractibility is the hallmark diagnostic feature of functional movement disorders
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.