Abstract
Minkowski applied Einstein's principle of relativity to moving media and developed electrodynamics of moving media, with Minkowski tensor as the stress-energy-momentum tensor. Recently, Partanen and Tulkki criticize that Minkowski tensor contradicts special relativity, and proposed a mass-polariton stress-energy-momentum (MP SEM) tensor to replace Minkowski tensor. In this paper, I reasonably argue: (i) all the physical results obtained from Minkowski tensor are already embodied in two EM field-strength tensors; (ii) all physical tensors in Einstein's special relativity must satisfy three rules, with Minkowski tensor following all the rules while both Abraham tensor and the MP SEM tensor not. Thus the two arguments provide a strong theoretical basis to solve the problem of the momentum of light in a medium. Finally, by enumerating a specific example I show that the Lorentz covariance of a tensor provides no guarantee of the consistency of the tensor with the principle of relativity.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.