Abstract
The development of weighted averaging models for diatoms and lake-water temperature is reviewed in relation to other factors controlling diatom abundance in lakes. It is argued that diatom–temperature models are weaker than those developed for salinity, pH and phosphorus. Moreover, even where a statistically significant model is developed for water temperature, its application over long time periods requires caution. For example, over long time periods (such as the Holocene), soil and vegetation will have changed considerably, altering lake-catchment hydrochemistry and hence the lake biota. Applications of diatom-temperature models in these instances may result in inferred temperatures that are merely artefacts of changing lake-water chemistry. However, palaeolimnological studies using variance partitioning analysis of diatom profiles in sediment cores and independent climate data show that climate signals are recorded in lake sediments. It is suggested, therefore, that the link between changing climate and diatoms be addressed via an alternative method than that of temperature-inference models. The situation demands a more complete understanding of the interactions between lake hydrodynamics and nutrient inputs from catchments over a variety of timescales.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.