Abstract

AbstractWe embed a directed graph G(V, E) in a representation of a naval minefield; vertices V represent waypoints and edges E denote possible segments for ship transit. A new model identifies a simple s‐t path through the minefield that minimizes the risk of incurring unacceptable damage from threats, that is, mine detonations. Traditional “edge‐additive” models rely on shortest‐path algorithms that over‐accumulate risk along a path. Our “threat‐additive” approach accumulates risk based upon the path's closest point of approach to each mine. We formulate and solve this model (1) using an integer program (IP) and its stronger variant, and (2) via an A* search algorithm. Preprocessing routines are key to reducing run times. We investigate the relative merits, both with respect to solution quality and requisite computational effort, of two types of graphs, one based on a rectilinear scheme and one based on Voronoi diagrams. We find that graphs based on Voronoi diagrams provide higher quality solutions with less computational effort, and that the A* search procedure requires less computational effort than solving instances of our models as IPs.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.