Abstract

This work presents a methodology for minimizing costs involved in the operation of a single line bus service. The model developed is based on optimal implementation of operational strategies tailored to passenger demand for a bi-directional single bus line. As a result, the commonly used timetable for Full Route Operation (FRO) will have to change to accommodate three types of strategies: short turn, limited stop, and mixed strategy (a combination of short turn and limited stop). The use of operational strategies will better match supply and demand, and will thus improve operation efficiency. The optimization model determines which trips of the given FRO timetable will be implemented with given strategies considering the trade-offs between passenger and operator costs. Moreover, in applying the model, the availability of real time information for passengers is considered in the calculation of waiting times. The proposed model is interpreted in the context of a small example, which serves as an explanatory devise. Then, it is applied to a real life case study in Dalian, China. The results show an indication that a significant saving could be attained by the use of multiple strategies. These savings were especially observed in the reduction of operational costs involved with the saving of travel times and running empty seats.

Highlights

  • Trip generation and trip attraction is closely related to land zone use

  • The promising results indicate that adjusting some Full Route Operation (FRO) bus trips from a given timetable to operate by other strategies can be applied to real life public transit systems to improve operation efficiency, and improve the match between supply and demand

  • This work has described the development of a methodology for an operational strategies problem based on a given timetable

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Trip generation and trip attraction is closely related to land zone use. A greater number of passengers appear in zones such as shopping zones, business zones, school zones, resident zones, etc. Such an operation situation could be efficiently improved by shifting some FRO bus trips to operate by other strategies This is because the use of other strategies opens up an opportunity to further save vehicle operating time, to reduce vehicle empty seat hours, and even to decrease the number of vehicles required, while ensuring that service levels for passengers are not less than an acceptable minimum value. These strategies include short turn, limited stop, deadhead, express, and zonal strategy, for which application for different beneficial conditions is illustrated, by Furth and Day (1985). A mixed strategy (Cortés et al 2011) and multiple strategies (Tang et al 2016) are worth exploring

Literature review
Problem formulation
Notations
Model with operational strategies
Example
Case study
Results
Sensitivity analysis for the saving time per a skipped stop
Computational times
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call