Abstract

Reaching movements are comprised of the coordinated action across multiple joints. The human skeleton is redundant for this task because different joint configurations can lead to the same endpoint in space. How do people learn to use combinations of joints that maximize success in goal-directed motor tasks? To answer this question, we used a 3-degree-of-freedom manipulandum to measure shoulder, elbow and wrist joint movements during reaching in a plane. We tested whether a shift in the relative contribution of the wrist and elbow joints to a reaching movement could be learned by an implicit reinforcement regime. Unknown to the participants, we decreased the task success for certain joint configurations (wrist flexion or extension, respectively) by adding random variability to the endpoint feedback. In return, the opposite wrist postures were rewarded in the two experimental groups (flexion and extension group). We found that the joint configuration slowly shifted towards movements that provided more control over the endpoint and hence higher task success. While the overall learning was significant, only the group that was guided to extend the wrist joint more during the movement showed substantial learning. Importantly, all changes in movement pattern occurred independent of conscious awareness of the experimental manipulation. These findings suggest that the motor system is generally sensitive to its output variability and can optimize joint-space solutions that minimize task-relevant output variability. We discuss biomechanical biases (e.g. joint’s range of movement) that could impose hurdles to the learning process.

Highlights

  • Learning a new motor skill often requires the coordinated action across several joints

  • We investigated whether the amount of this learning mechanism correlated with the behavioral variability at baseline, thereby testing the hypothesis that increased exploration is related to more reinforcement learning [26]

  • Visualizing the joint angles (Fig 2A) revealed that the movement was mostly accomplished by a combination of elbow extension (34.71 ± 1.23 ̊) and shoulder flexion (-14.34 ± 1.18 ̊), which is in line with earlier findings [31]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Learning a new motor skill often requires the coordinated action across several joints. The biomechanics of the human body equip us with abundant degrees of freedom, meaning that many different movements in joint space achieve the same task goal. When performing a backhand stroke in tennis, for example, different combinations of joint movement in the trunk, shoulder, elbow and wrist yield a successful hit. There will be some joint configurations that allow for more control over the racket, and therewith reduce the variability of the returning ball trajectory and increase the success of achieving the desired action [2]. The many years of training required to become a motor expert are, to some degree, spent on acquiring the optimal movement solutions in joint space. What are the learning mechanisms that underlie this process?

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.