Abstract

BackgroundSimon’s two-stage design is the most widely implemented among multi-stage designs in phase II clinical trials to assess the activity of a new treatment in a single-arm study. In this two-stage design, the sample size from the second stage is fixed regardless of the number of responses observed in the first stage.MethodsWe develop a new minimax adaptive design for phase II clinical trials, by using the branch-and-bound intelligent algorithm based on conditional error functions.ResultsWe compare the performance of the proposed design and competitors, including Simon’s minimax design, and a modified Simon’s design that allows early stopping for futility or efficacy. The maximum sample size of the proposed minimax adaptive design is guaranteed to be less than or equal to those from other existing designs. When the proposed design has the same maximum sample size as others, it always has the smallest expected sample size. In addition to the minimax adaptive design, we also introduce admissible adaptive designs determined from a Bayesian perspective.ConclusionsThe proposed adaptive minimax design can save sample sizes for a clinical trial. The minimum required sample size is critical to reduce the cost of a project.

Highlights

  • Simon’s two-stage design is the most widely implemented among multi-stage designs in phase II clinical trials to assess the activity of a new treatment in a single-arm study

  • For Oncology clinical trials, the response criteria may be determined by the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) [1]

  • The traditional experiment in phase II Oncology trials is often conducted in a single arm study, which is popular in other studies, such as AIDS

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Simon’s two-stage design is the most widely implemented among multi-stage designs in phase II clinical trials to assess the activity of a new treatment in a single-arm study. In this two-stage design, the sample size from the second stage is fixed regardless of the number of responses observed in the first stage. In Simon’s design and the modified Simon’s design due to Mander and Thompson [3], the second stage sample size is always fixed and is not allowed to be modified as the result observed from the first stage. To make a design flexible and efficient, adaptive designs have been developed to allow the second stage sample size to depend on first

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.