Abstract
Objective: Our study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of cortical screws in regards to postoperative pain.Background: Pedicle screw fixation is the current mainstay technique for posterior spinal fusion. Over the past decade, a new technique called cortical screw fixation has been developed, which allows for medialized screw placement through stronger cortical bone. There have been several studies that showed either biomechanical equivalence or superiority of cortical screws. However, there is currently only a single study in the literature looking at clinical outcomes of cortical screw fixation in patients who have had no prior spine surgery.Methods: We prospectively looked at the senior author’s patients who underwent cortical versus pedicle lumbar screw fixation surgeries between 2013 and 2015 for lumbar degenerative disease. Eighteen patients underwent cortical screw fixation, and 15 patients underwent traditional pedicle screw fixation. We looked at immediate postoperative pain, changes in short-term pain (six to 12 weeks post-surgery), and changes in long-term pain (six to eight months). All pain outcomes were measured using a visual analog scale ranging from 1 to 10. Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to measure continuous data, and the Fisher Exact test was used to measure categorical data as appropriate.Results: Our results showed that the cortical screw cohort showed a trend towards having less peak postoperative pain (p = 0.09). The average postoperative pain was similar between the two cohorts (p = 0.93). There was also no difference in pain six to 12 weeks after surgery (p = 0.8). However, at six to eight months, the cortical screw cohort had worse pain compared to the pedicle screw cohort (p = 0.02).Conclusions: The cortical screw patients showed a trend towards less peak pain in the short-term (one to three days post-surgery) and more pain in the long-term (six to eight months post-surgery) compared to pedicle screw patients. Both cohorts had a statistically significant reduction in pain levels compared to preoperative pain. More studies are needed to further evaluate postoperative pain, long-term functional outcomes, and fusion rates in patients who undergo cortical screw fixation.
Highlights
Every year, over 120,000 lumbar fusions are performed nationwide for degenerative and traumatic spine conditions [1]
Our study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of cortical screws in regards to postoperative pain
Our results showed that the cortical screw cohort showed a trend towards having less peak postoperative pain (p = 0.09)
Summary
Over 120,000 lumbar fusions are performed nationwide for degenerative and traumatic spine conditions [1]. In keeping with the push to perform more minimally invasive spine surgery, a new technique of spinal instrumentation has been developed whereby screws are placed through a starting point at the junction of the superior articular process and pars. This technique is called cortical screw fixation (Figure 1). There have been several studies that showed either biomechanical equivalence or superiority of cortical screws compared to pedicle screws [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. There is currently only a single study in the literature looking at clinical outcomes of cortical screw fixation in patients who have had no prior spine surgery
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
