Minimally invasive hallux valgus correction: Is it better than open surgery?

Abstract

BackgroundThe aim was to compare the minimally invasive (MIS) chevron osteotomy to the well-established open chevron osteotomy for the correction of hallux valgus deformity. MethodsTwo retrospective cohorts of patients treated with MIS or open chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus correction, matched for age and gender with a minimum follow up of six months were reviewed. Functional outcomes were evaluated using pre and post-operative Manchester Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire (MOXFQ), Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain and the Unified Elective Orthopaedic Score (UnEOS). Two independent, blinded examiners evaluated the radiographic correction of hallux valgus (HV) and intermetatarsal (IM) angle. ResultsA Total of 54 cases (27 per study group) with a mean follow-up of 25.9 months were included in the study. Pre-operatively, VAS (p = 0.76) and MOXFQ (p = 0.46) scores and HV angle (p = 0.1) were comparable in both groups. However, IM angle was significantly larger in the MIS group (p = 0.005). Post-operatively there was significant improvement in VAS and MOXFQ scores as well as significant correction of the HV and IM angles (p < 0.0001) for both groups. Comparing the two procedures, there was no significant difference between groups for VAS (p = 0.34), MOXFQ scores (p = 0.56) and HV angles (p = 0.069) but the MIS technique was significantly better in improving the IM angle (p = 0.016). The post-operative UnEOS score and the Satisfaction UnEOS domain reached excellent levels for the entire cohort with no statistical difference between the two groups (p = 0.2 and 0.28 respectively). ConclusionResults show MIS chevron osteotomy provides better radiographic correction of the IM angle but functional outcomes for all parameters were comparable to the open technique. It can therefore be considered at least equivalent to standard open surgery when compared using validated Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).