Abstract

AimCurrently, cohort studies reported the use of minimally invasive arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP I). The aim of this systematic literature review was to analyse clinical, radiological outcome and complications with this technique. MethodsA systemic literature search of the databases Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE and Cochrane to identify studies reporting on clinical, radiological outcome or complications of minimally invasive MTP I arthrodesis was conducted. ResultsA total of 6 studies (1 Level V, 5 Level IV) reporting on 109 minimally invasive MTP arthrodesis in 105 patients were included. Validated scores were reported in 103 cases. Clinical outcome improved in 57 cases from a mean of 36.9 to 82.6 points American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) and in 46 cases from 38.7 to 18.4 points Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). Radiological fusion rate was 87% (n = 94 out of 109) achieved after 6–12 weeks.Overall complication rate was 11.9% (13 cases) leading to revision surgeries in 5.5% (6 cases). Most common complications Most common complications were symptomatic non-union (n = 6, 5.5%), asymptomatic non-union (n = 2, 1.8%) and subsequent interphalangeal joint arthritis (n = 2, 1.8%). ConclusionMinimally invasive MTP I arthrodesis is a promising technique with comparable clinical, radiological outcome and complication rates to open surgery in hallux rigidus and rigido-valgus. Future studies are needed providing higher level of evidence to prove the potential benefit of minimally invasive compared to open MTP I arthrodesis.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.