Abstract

Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment plays a central role in risk stratification and treatment guidance in paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). As such, MRD prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a major factor that is independently correlated with outcome. High burden of MRD is negatively correlated with post-transplant survival, as both the risk of leukaemia recurrence and non-relapse mortality increase with greater levels of MRD. Despite growing evidence supporting these findings, controversies still exist. In particular, it is still not clear whether multiparameter flow cytometry and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, which is used to recognise immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements, can be employed interchangeably. Moreover, the higher sensitivity in MRD quantification offered by next-generation sequencing techniques may further refine the ability to stratify transplant-associated risks. While MRD quantification from bone marrow prior to HSCT remains the state of the art, heavily pre-treated patients may benefit from additional staging, such as using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography to detect focal residues of disease. Additionally, the timing of MRD detection (i.e., immediately before administration of the conditioning regimen or weeks before) is a matter of debate. Pre-transplant MRD negativity has previously been associated with superior outcomes; however, in the recent For Omitting Radiation Under Majority age (FORUM) study, pre-HSCT MRD positivity was associated with neither relapse risk nor survival. In this review, we discuss the level of MRD that may require pre-transplant therapy intensification, risking time delay and complications (as well as losing the window for HSCT if disease progression occurs), as opposed to an adapted post-transplant strategy to achieve long-term remission. Indeed, MRD monitoring may be a valuable tool to guide individualised treatment decisions, including tapering of immunosuppression, cellular therapies (such as donor lymphocyte infusions) or additional immunotherapy (such as bispecific T-cell engagers or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy).

Highlights

  • During the last decades, minimal residual disease (MRD) quantification has been proven as the leading assessment tool in the evaluation of treatment response and stratification of patient risk in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) [1,2,3,4,5,6]

  • A recent study combining the results of 39 trials conducted in paediatric patients and adults using either multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based approaches to quantify MRD showed that persistence of MRD in non-haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) trials was consistently associated with inferior prognosis regardless of trial approach and method of MRD detection [8]

  • Relapses in next generation sequencing (NGS)-MRD negative patients may reflect incomplete sampling of hypoplastic marrow; NGS-MRD libraries prepared at the 30-day time point contained significantly fewer total sequences than those prepared at any other time point

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Minimal (or measurable) residual disease (MRD) quantification has been proven as the leading assessment tool in the evaluation of treatment response and stratification of patient risk in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) [1,2,3,4,5,6]. A recent study combining the results of 39 trials conducted in paediatric patients and adults using either multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based approaches to quantify MRD showed that persistence of MRD in non-HSCT trials was consistently associated with inferior prognosis regardless of trial approach and method of MRD detection [8]. This finding highlights a need for interventions in MRD-positive patients and suggests that MRD response could be used as an early endpoint to assess the effectiveness of different therapies. The reader is directed to a companion paper in this issue on indications for HSCT by Truong et al

METHODS
Method
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call