Minimal power required to ascend a flight of stairs versus actual power measured with body-fixed sensors in adults aged 19-85 years.

Abstract

A good stair-climbing (SC) ability is crucial for independent living in older adults. A simple formula that estimates the mean power needed to ascend a flight of stairs in a predetermined time (i.e., total ascent duration) is easy to implement in practice, but lacks information on actual power values generated per step. The latter is possible with body-fixed sensors. This study aimed at comparing both methodologies and investigating their sensitivity to detect age-related differences. 318 participants (162 ♀; age 19-85 years) were tested on a 6-step staircase and two methodologies were used to estimate mean SC power: (1) a body-fixed sensor with automated detection of power production per step, and (2) a mathematic equation based on timed ascent duration, body mass and stair height. SC power was 210.4 W lower with formula compared to sensor, lower in women versus men and in older versus young adults (p < 0.001). The difference in SC power between sensor and formula was greater in individuals with better performance (i.e., men and young adults) (p < 0.001), indicating a ceiling effect of the formula in well-functioning and younger individuals. Likewise, ICC's between both methodologies showed poor reliability in people aged <65 years (0.087-0.363) and moderate to good reliability in people aged ≥65 years (0.453-0.780). To conclude, participants with better SC performance are able to largely overshoot the minimal power required to ascend the stairs in a certain duration. This makes the sensor more sensitive to identify early age-related differences compared to the formula.