Abstract

BackgroundLaparoscopic surgery for penetrating Crohn’s disease (CD) still remains highly conflicting due to a lack of sufficient data. Therefore, the following large study was designed to compare postoperative outcomes after minimal-invasive resections for penetrating and non-penetrating CD.MethodsConsecutive patients, who underwent laparoscopic intestinal resection for symptomatic CD at a tertiary academic referral center, were included. Patients were divided according to perioperative findings in penetrating and non-penetrating type of disease. All clinical data were obtained from an institutional database and analyzed retrospectively.ResultsOf 234 patients enrolled, 101 patients [females: n = 54 (53.5 %)] were operated on for non-penetrating CD and 133 patients [females: n = 50 (37.6 %)] for penetrating CD. Fistulas (p < 0.001), inflammatory mass (p < 0.001) and abscess formation (p < 0.001) were observed more frequently in the perforating group. Ileocolic resections were performed predominantly in both groups [perforating CD: n = 110 (82.7 %), non-perforating CD: n = 82 (81.2 %)], with more complex resections (>1 intestinal resection) found in perforating CD (p < 0.001). Conversion rates did not differ significantly. Notably, 30-day postoperative morbidity was comparable for both groups [perforating CD: n = 20 (15 %), non-perforating CD: n = 19 (18.8 %), p = 0.44]. Postoperative complication rates graded according to the Clavien–Dindo classification showed no difference too (p = 0.49).ConclusionLaparoscopic surgery can be conducted safely in selected patients with penetrating CD without increasing the risk of postoperative complications. This finding needs to be implemented in future guidelines.

Highlights

  • Background Laparoscopic surgery for penetratingCrohn’s disease (CD) still remains highly conflicting due to a lack of sufficient data

  • We present the largest study to date comparing outcomes of laparoscopic resection for penetrating and non-penetrating disease

  • Intraoperative findings were significantly different between both groups in terms of the presence of inflammatory mass [penetrating CD (PCD): n = 85 (63.9 %), nonpenetrating CD (NPCD): n = 14 (13.9 %), p \ 0.0001], fistula [PCD: n = 118 (88.7 %), NPCD: n = 0, p \ 0.0001] and abscess formation [PCD: n = 43 (32.3 %), NPCD: n = 0, p \ 0.0001]

Read more

Summary

Objectives

Our aim is to treat the majority of CD patients by using a minimal-invasive approach; patients with previous laparotomies in association with penetrating disease are still often managed by laparotomy

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call