Abstract

IntroductionThe present study evaluated the putative effect of hypobaria on resting HRV in normoxia and hypoxia.MethodsFifteen young pilot trainees were exposed to five different conditions in a randomized order: normobaric normoxia (NN, PB = 726 ± 5 mmHg, FIO2 = 20.9%), hypobaric normoxia (HN, PB = 380 ± 6 mmHg, FIO2≅40%), normobaric hypoxia (NH, PB = 725 ± 4 mmHg, FIO2≅11%); and hypobaric hypoxia (HH at 3000 and 5500 m, HH3000 and HH5500, PB = 525 ± 6 and 380 ± 8 mmHg, respectively, FIO2 = 20.9%). HRV and pulse arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) were measured at rest seated during a 6 min period in each condition. HRV parameters were analyzed (Kubios HVR Standard, V 3.0) for time (RMSSD) and frequency (LF, HF, LF/HF ratio, and total power). Gas exchanges were collected at rest for 10 min following HRV recording.ResultsSpO2 decreased in HH3000 (95 ± 3) and HH5500 (81 ± 5), when compared to NN (99 ± 0). SpO2 was higher in NH (86 ± 4) than HH5500 but similar between HN (98 ± 2) and NN. Participants showed lower RMSSD and total power values in NH and HH5500 when compared to NN. In hypoxia, LF/HF ratio was greater in HH5500 than NH, whereas in normoxia, LF/HF ratio was lower in HN than NN. Minute ventilation was higher in HH5500 than in all other conditions.DiscussionThe present study reports a slight hypobaric effect either in normoxia or in hypoxia on some HRV parameters. In hypoxia, with a more prominent sympathetic activation, the hypobaric effect is likely due to the greater ventilation stimulus and larger desaturation. In normoxia, the HRV differences may come from the hyperoxic breathing and slight breathing pattern change due to hypobaria in HN.

Highlights

  • The present study evaluated the putative effect of hypobaria on resting Heart Rate Variability rate variability (HRV) in normoxia and hypoxia

  • The present results suggest a larger predominance of the sympathetic activity in hypobaric hypoxia

  • RMSSD decreased in HH3000 (p = 0.013) and HH5500 (p < 0.001) when compared to NN

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The present study evaluated the putative effect of hypobaria on resting HRV in normoxia and hypoxia. Environmental hypoxia is a condition characterized by a decrease in the inspired oxygen pressure (PIO2) (Millet et al, 2012), which per se has a negative influence on autonomic cardiac response (Botek et al, 2015) and induces systemic/integrative metabolic, endocrine and vascular compensation (Marshall, 1998). Heart rate variability is a non-invasive method to assess the cardiac autonomic control (Buchheit, 2014) and is commonly used to monitor fatigue and overreaching in athletes (Meeusen et al, 2013; Bourdillon et al, 2017), despite some debates about the pro and cons of the time (i.e., root mean square of the successive differences, RMSSD) (Plews et al, 2012) vs frequency [i.e., spectral power in low frequency (LF), high frequency (HF) and total power (LF + HF)] domain HRV parameters (Schmitt et al, 2015)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call