Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation

Qiukui Hao,Dena Zeraatkar,Anila Qasim,Tahira Devji,Yuting Wang,Thomas Agoritsas,Tuomas Lähdeoja,Per Olav Vandvik,Alonso Carrasco-Labra,Gordon Guyatt,Reed A C Siemieniuk

doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028777

Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation

Qiukui Hao, Dena Zeraatkar + Show 9 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028777

Copy DOI

Journal: BMJ open	Publication Date: Feb 1, 2019
Citations: 85	License type: open-access

Affiliation: Sichuan University, Impact, McMaster University, University Hospital of Geneva, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Innlandet Hospital Trust, University of Oslo

#Minimal Important Differences #Anchor-based Minimal Important Differences + Show 8 more

Abstract
Full-Text PDF
Similar Papers

Abstract

ObjectivesTo identify credible anchor-based minimal important differences (MIDs) for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) relevant to a BMJ Rapid Recommendations addressing subacromial decompression surgery for shoulder pain.DesignSystematic review.Outcome measuresEstimates of anchor-based...

Full Text