Minilaparotomy approach to terminal ileal Crohn's disease.

Abstract

The feasibility and safety of a minilaparotomy approach to terminal ileal Crohn's disease have not been fully elucidated. The purpose of this study was to compare early outcomes utilizing this technique as an alternative to conventional approaches. Nine patients with terminal ileal Crohn's disease (but no complicating enteric fistulas) who underwent minilaparotomy between January 1998 and September 2000 were studied prospectively. The minilaparotomy approach entails a complete surgical procedure performed through a skin incision of less than 7 cm. Ten similar patients who underwent conventional laparotomy between January 1995 and December 1997 served as the control group. Age, gender, body weight, height, body mass index, number of prior laparotomies, operating times, operative blood loss, and types of operative procedure were similar for cases and controls. The length of the laparotomy incision in the minilaparotomy approach group was significantly shorter than that in the conventional approach group (median length 6.0 vs. 16.5 cm; p <0.05). Postoperative intervals until initial standing and walking were significantly shorter for minilaparotomy patients than conventional surgery patients (p <0.05 and p <0.05, respectively), whereas postoperative intervals until passing flatus, urinary catheter removal, and tolerance of liquids and solids did not differ for the two groups, nor did the analgesic requirement or postoperative hospital stay. Postoperative complications developed in two conventional-group patients; none was noted with the minilaparotomy approach. Our data suggest that the minilaparotomy approach to terminal ileal Crohn's disease without an enteric fistula is feasible, safe, and less invasive than the conventional approach.