Abstract

A compact CPW-fed triband slot antenna for WLAN/WiMAX applications is proposed. The proposed antenna is formed by an asymmetric ring, an inverted L-strip, and a straight strip. By employing these structures, the antenna can generate three operation bands with compact size and simple structure. The measured and simulated results show the presented antenna has impedance bandwidths of 100 MHz (2.39–2.49 GHz), 360 MHz (3.36–3.72 GHz), and 760 MHz (5.13–5.89 GHz), which covers both WLAN in the 2.4/5.2 GHz bands and WiMAX in the 3.5/5.5 GHz bands. The antenna is successfully simulated and measured, showing triple bands can be obtained by using three different radiators and also indicating that the proposed antenna is suitable for the WiMAX/WLAN applications.

Highlights

  • In recent years, with the rapid development of WLAN/ WiMAX systems, the demand for antennas with small size, low cost, multifrequency operation capabilities, and high efficiency has increased

  • The multiband antenna is more attractive than broadband antenna, because the broadband antennas contain dispensable bands in WLAN/WiMAX system

  • It can be seen that center frequencies of the three bands are almost unchanged, and the first band of the proposed triband antenna is unaffected by l4

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With the rapid development of WLAN/ WiMAX systems, the demand for antennas with small size, low cost, multifrequency operation capabilities, and high efficiency has increased. Many multiband antennas have been proposed for WLAN or WiMAX applications such as [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. A CPW-fed antenna [1] composed of U-shaped and triangular radiating elements can generate two bands to meet the requirements for WLAN/WiMAX systems. Triband antenna only for WiMAX application is obtained by a coupled dual-U-shaped radiator in [5]. In [9] a microstrip-fed monopole antenna with a fork-shaped strip is proposed to meet WLAN and WiMAX applications. The dimensions of antennas in [9, 10] are with large size of 34.5 × 18 × 1 mm3 [9], 30 × 20 × 0.8 mm3 [10], and 30 × 18 × 1.6 mm3 [11] which may limit their integration with future miniaturized wireless communication systems

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call