Abstract

The present study assessed the circumstances under which size estimation biases in spider phobia occur, and whether such biases are modifiable by treatment. Women with (n = 67) and without (n = 33) spider phobia approached a spider during a behavioral approach test (BAT). They provided size estimates of the spider both during and shortly after the BAT (with the spider in view, or not in view, respectively). Phobic women then received cognitive therapy or a placebo treatment and one week later they underwent a second BAT and provided size estimates of the same spider during and after the BAT. Phobic women reported larger size estimates than non-phobic women after, but not during, the BAT. Size estimates after, but not during, the BAT correlated with self-reported fear but not avoidance. Size estimates after, but not during, the BAT reduced from the first to second BAT in phobic women; an effect evident in both the cognitive therapy and placebo treatment conditions. Changes in size estimates were not associated with treatment-induced reductions in fear or avoidance. These results suggest that estimation biases in spider phobia are likely driven by non-perceptual processes. The clinical utility of size estimation measures is discussed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call