Abstract

Sensor technologies allow ethologists to continuously monitor the behaviors of large numbers of animals over extended periods of time. This creates new opportunities to study livestock behavior in commercial settings, but also new methodological challenges. Densely sampled behavioral data from large heterogeneous groups can contain a range of complex patterns and stochastic structures that may be difficult to visualize using conventional exploratory data analysis techniques. The goal of this research was to assess the efficacy of unsupervised machine learning tools in recovering complex behavioral patterns from such datasets to better inform subsequent statistical modeling. This methodological case study was carried out using records on milking order, or the sequence in which cows arrange themselves as they enter the milking parlor. Data was collected over a 6-month period from a closed group of 200 mixed-parity Holstein cattle on an organic dairy. Cows at the front and rear of the queue proved more consistent in their entry position than animals at the center of the queue, a systematic pattern of heterogeneity more clearly visualized using entropy estimates, a scale and distribution-free alternative to variance robust to outliers. Dimension reduction techniques were then used to visualize relationships between cows. No evidence of social cohesion was recovered, but Diffusion Map embeddings proved more adept than PCA at revealing the underlying linear geometry of this data. Median parlor entry positions from the pre- and post-pasture subperiods were highly correlated (R = 0.91), suggesting a surprising degree of temporal stationarity. Data Mechanics visualizations, however, revealed heterogeneous non-stationary among subgroups of animals in the center of the group and herd-level temporal outliers. A repeated measures model recovered inconsistent evidence of a relationships between entry position and cow attributes. Mutual conditional entropy tests, a permutation-based approach to assessing bivariate correlations robust to non-independence, confirmed a significant but non-linear association with peak milk yield, but revealed the age effect to be potentially confounded by health status. Finally, queueing records were related back to behaviors recorded via ear tag accelerometers using linear models and mutual conditional entropy tests. Both approaches recovered consistent evidence of differences in home pen behaviors across subsections of the queue.

Highlights

  • For much of its history, ethological research in livestock has relied on human observers to encode behaviors of interest [1]

  • The purpose of this research was contrast the behavioral insights gleaned from Unsupervised machine learning (UML) algorithms with those recovered using conventional exploratory data analysis (EDA) techniques, and to explore how such information could be best integrated into standard linear analysis pipelines

  • We explore the utility of this alternative strategy here by again employing a mutual conditional entropy (MCE) test to identify significant associations between these two behavioral axes [35]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For much of its history, ethological research in livestock has relied on human observers to encode behaviors of interest [1]. Extensive involvement of research personnel in the data collection phase nurtures a deeper familiarity with the system under study. This aids in the specification of an appropriate statistical model and interpretation of results, but is often critical in identifying unexpected behavioral patterns that can inspire novel hypotheses. The inherent quality of such data imposes practical limitations on the quantity that can be produced. This can restrict both the number of animals utilized in a study and the period of time over which they are observed. If the pre-existing base of scientific literature does not provide clear guidance on the selection of target animals or focal periods, such strategies may risk overlooking finer-grain behavioral patterns and skewing inferences about the collective behavior of the group [3, 4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call