Abstract

This paper aims to contribute to the understanding of the potential of Social Innovation (SI) for social transformation. Being a popular concept, SI has been discussed for decades, increasingly recognized for its complexity. A systematic review of the literature on SI was undertaken to understand the state-of-the-art, the evolution of the concept and its core underpinnings in order to meet the research aim of this paper. The literature is relatively broad in relation to general characteristics of SI and contexts where it is happening, but the use of the ‘social innovation’ term often reveals semantic problems, generating multiple, interchangeable and mixed understandings. In this paper, we identify and discuss two ways of using SI in the literature: (i) one that favours the materialization of SI, as something tangible that can be observed, measured and systematically analysed; we called this a cartesian approach; and (ii) another that uses systemic thinking focussing on successful factors of SI to enhance its transformative capacity in existing system(s) through change in routines, resources, and beliefs; we called this a disruptive approach. While still emerging in SI literature the academic discussion about SI dynamics and its transformative capacity is increasingly addressed by scholars. We conclude the paper by arguing that more transformative-driven and systemic SI may enhance its potential to lead change, while it only creates transformation when it scales-up or out, and when it has durability and transformative impact.

Highlights

  • Social Innovation (SI) has been discussed for decades and recognized for its complexity

  • Despite multiple and varied understandings of social innovation it is possible to agree on a common rationale that can be expressed as the promotion of social inclusion to respond to social needs and societal challenges, while creating changes in the system where the innovation occurs

  • Drawing on the literature reviewed and as discussed above, we recognize in the literature two ways of using SI: an analytical or cartesian approach and a systemic or disruptive approach

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social Innovation (SI) has been discussed for decades and recognized for its complexity. SI has been described as being context specific [3], involving some degree of novelty (in all cases or only in the context where it occurs) [3,4,5,6,7,8,9] and practical application. It seems well acknowledged in the literature that it is not enough to have an innovative idea, but it needs to be implementable, and implemented [5,6,8]. SI promotes social inclusion, quality of human life and well-being [10,11,12,13], changing social relationships [7,8,10,13,14], engaging and mobilizing beneficiaries [3,8], creating new roles and relations, enhancing society’s capacity to act [6,15] and empowering its beneficiaries [3,9]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call