Abstract

AbstractSmall‐scale fisheries (SSFs) tend to target shallow waters, but the depth distributions of coastal fish can vary depending on species, size, and sex. This creates a scope for a form of fishing selectivity that has received limited attention but can have considerable implications for monitoring and management of these fisheries. We conducted a case study on the Norwegian wrasse fishery, a developing SSF in which multiple species are caught in shallow waters (mean depth = 4.5 m) to be used as cleaner fish in aquaculture. Several of these wrasses have life histories and behaviors that are sensitive to selective fishing mortality, such as sexual size dimorphism, paternal care, and sex change. An experimental fishery was undertaken over three sampling periods in 2018. Data on catch, length, and sex of wrasses across a depth gradient (0–18 m) were collected and analyzed. We found that depth distributions were species specific and the vertical overlap with the fishery was high for Corkwing Wrasse Symphodus melops and Ballan Wrasse Labrus bergylta, which were most abundant at depths less than 5 m. Three other wrasse species had invariant or increasing abundance with depth and were therefore less likely to be negatively impacted by this fishery. Body size was positively correlated with depth for these wrasses, and sex ratio became more male biased for the Corkwing Wrasse, the only species that could be visually sexed. This study demonstrates that depth can have strong effects on fishing selectivity at multiple scales and that such knowledge is necessary to develop management strategies that balance fishing mortality sustainably across species, sizes, and sexes. We recommend that management priorities be directed toward the Ballan and Corkwing wrasses—the species having the highest vertical overlap with the fishery. Furthermore, CPUE was strongly affected by seasonality and positively correlated with increasing wave exposure for one of the species. This underscores the general importance of standardizing catch data for several environmental covariates when monitoring species that are affected by SSFs.

Highlights

  • Ballan and Corkwing wrasses were most abundant at less than 5-m depth and showed the strongest overlap with the fishing depth in the commercial fishery (Tables 2, 3; Figures 4, 5). This had a strong effect on catch composition: for example, the Corkwing Wrasse CPUE at 0.5 m was twice as high as the CPUE in traps set only 5 m deeper (Figure 4)

  • The Goldsinny Wrasse was more evenly distributed with depth, while CPUE increased with depth for Cuckoo Wrasse and Rock Cook, with the former showing the steepest gradient

  • There were strong seasonal effects on CPUE, with the pooled CPUE for wrasses being four to six times higher in September and October compared to June (Figure 4; Table 3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To assess depth-dependent fishing selectivity and its implications, detailed knowledge of the vertical distributions of both fish and fisheries is needed, but there are few examples in which such information has been considered for SSFs (but see Tyler et al 2009; Collins and McBride 2011; Mitchell et al 2014) This is somewhat surprising given the obvious relevance of this information for managing fisheries on multiple species with different depth distributions (Moore et al 2016; Gilman et al 2019). Wrasse fishers predominantly target shallow waters (1–7 m) to avoid inflicting barotrauma on their catch (Halvorsen et al 2017b), some of the target species have much wider depth ranges than the depths that are fished (Table 1) This fishery may have differential impacts on species, sizes, and sexes depending on the species’ vertical distributions relative to the fishing depths

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.