Abstract
It is known that if an operator T is complex symmetric then its Aluthge transform is also complex symmetric. This Note is devoted to showing that the Duggal transform doesn?t inherit this property. For instance, we?ll show that the Duggal transform isn?t always complex symmetric when T is, as it was claimed in [5].
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
