Abstract

A Eurozone fiscal buffer fund could be set up to finance transfers to countries triggered by the cyclical movements in their unemployment rate. Countries would contribute a fixed share of their GDP to the fund in good times. The receipts from the fund are found to significantly mitigate the fiscal contractions during downturns and thus help bolster the stability of the Eurozone economy by counteracting the pro-cyclicality of fiscal policies. To quantify the extent of macroeconomic stabilisation thus achieved, estimates for the ‘fiscal multipliers’ are superimposed on the assumed change in fiscal policies. It suggests that a Eurozone buffer fund would have significant stabilisation properties.The computations are carried out using two databases – the European Commission's AMECO database and the OECD Economic Outlook database -- by way of a robustness check.

Highlights

  • In its first two decades of existence the Eurozone has experienced pronounced cyclical swings in economic activity, with an almost unabated expansion until the global financial crisis in 2008-2009 followed by a deep slump as the ensuing sovereign debt crisis unwound

  • This paper examines to what extent the creation of Eurozone buffer fund, to which Member States contribute in good times and draw on in bad times, would have changed the conduct of discretionary policies in a counter-cyclical direction

  • The assumptions to calculate the flow of transfers to/from a Eurozone buffer fund adopted in this paper can be summarised as follows: 1. All member states contribute a fixed 0.35% of GDP to the buffer fund

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In its first two decades of existence the Eurozone has experienced pronounced cyclical swings in economic activity, with an almost unabated expansion until the global financial crisis in 2008-2009 followed by a deep slump as the ensuing sovereign debt crisis unwound. Discretionary fiscal policies have frequently overruled the working of the automatic stabilisers in the Eurozone e.g. as governments cut expenditure in response to fiscal shortfalls caused by the cycle -- muting their smoothing impact, both in good and in bad times (Van den Noord 2019). Some of this could have been avoided had governments built up sufficient buffers in good times Against this backdrop, this paper examines to what extent the creation of Eurozone buffer fund, to which Member States contribute in good times and draw on in bad times, would have changed the conduct of discretionary policies in a counter-cyclical direction. This is followed by a discussion of the analysis while the final section concludes

Why a buffer fund?
Pros and cons
Examples
Assumptions
Fund size and evolution
Triggers and transfers
The Netherlands
Response of discretionary fiscal policy
Italy 17
France
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.