Abstract

Workplace bullying is important to business and government, because it has a real impact on unfortunate casualties’ wellbeing and organizations’ benefits. Studies into the causes and outcomes of workplace bullying with a focus on the key psychodynamic factors underlying harassment and the subsequent results are rare. This paper applies Rene Girard’s mimetic desire theory to clarify the elements and non-cognizant components associated with “interdividual” connections prompting aggression for the victim by the harasser. The disclosure of mirror neurons affirms that mimetic desire grows unwittingly through a mediator of the mimetic brain. Mimetic desire theory helps to recognize and understand that the destructive patterns of behavior and emotional responses to situations leading to moral harassment is a direct consequence of the mimetic rivalry between the bully and the victim. The unconscious mechanism is then brought up to the consciousness. The bully and the victim can avoid becoming entrapped within dysfunctional and toxic relationships such as bullying. The use of the mimetic desire concepts also enables human resources managers, bystanders, and practitioners to better deal with protagonists. This can help minimize or eliminate workplace bullying.

Highlights

  • The SUMMER survey was based on 47,983 interviewees and showed that violence at work between 2003 and 2010 grew in terms of hostile behavior (+6%), scornful behavior (+5%), denial of recognition of work (+3%), and degrading attacks (+1%) (DARES, 2012, p. 6)

  • This paper presents a theoretical model for the study of Workplace bullying (WPB) based on the mimetic desire theory (MDT) of René Girard (Girard, 1965)

  • Al contagion may lead to rivalry, which would From the original critical incident (Leymann, make problematic the distribution of resources, 1990) – and throughout the entire bullying periand it may lead to herding, which would result od – the mimetic theory sheds light on the genein irrational mob behaviors

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The SUMMER survey (medical surveillance of exposures to occupational risks) was based on 47,983 interviewees and showed that violence at work between 2003 and 2010 grew in terms of hostile behavior (+6%), scornful behavior (+5%), denial of recognition of work (+3%), and degrading attacks (+1%) (DARES, 2012, p. 6). By only looking at WPB prevalence, antecedent or outcome, the community has not yet scrutinized what Faulx (2007) calls the “blind box” of harassment: the deep understanding of the psychological mechanisms at work between the bully and the victim. Rai and Agarwal (2016) point out the shortcomings of existing WPB literature concerning its conceptual clarity, process, theoretical underpinning and underlying mechanisms. They suggest focusing on the theoretical underpinnings of WPB. The MDT is proposed as a mean for consciousness improvement for the victim, bully, as well as bystanders, management, HR managers and practitioners

LITERATURE ON WPB
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call