Abstract

Subjects drinking milk (n= 45) had higher levels of milk protein IgG in their sera than non-milk drinkers (n=125, P<0.001). Subjects with gastrointestinal problems related to milk drinking consumed less milk but had higher milk protein IgG levels than those with no milk-related gastrointestinal symptoms (P=0.03). Among the symptomatic subjects, those reporting dyspeptic symptoms had lower milk protein IgG levels than nondyspeptics (P<0.05). However, dyspepsia was not associated with milk drinking (P=0.59). The association of high milk protein IgG levels with constipation was close to the level of statistical significance. Diarrhea had no association with milk protein IgG level (P=0.5). With regard to minor symptoms, flatulence and bloating (P=0.92), were not associated with milk protein IgG level. Milk protein IgA levels did not show any association with milk drinking or abdominal symptoms. The levels of milk protein IgA and IgG declined as the age of the subjects increased (P<0.001). Conclusion Milk protein IgG but not milk IgA seems to be associated with self-reported milk-induced gastrointestinal symptoms.

Highlights

  • Backround To study the association between serum levels of milk protein IgG and IgA antibodies and milk-related gastrointestinal symptoms in adults

  • Milk protein IgG but not milk IgA seems to be associated with self-reported milk-induced gastrointestinal symptoms

  • Subjects with gastrointestinal problems related to milk drinking consumed less milk but had higher milk protein IgG levels than those with no milk-related gastrointestinal symptoms (P=0.03)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Backround To study the association between serum levels of milk protein IgG and IgA antibodies and milk-related gastrointestinal symptoms in adults. Milk protein IgG and IgA: the association with milk-induced gastrointestinal symptoms in adults From Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Meeting 2011 Venice, Italy. Methods Milk protein IgG and IgA antibodies were determined in serum samples of 270 subjects. Subjects were randomly selected from a total of 1560 adults undergoing laboratory investigations in primary care.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.