Abstract
Sixty-six subjects diagnosed by validated criteria as having senile dementia of the Alzheimer type (SDAT) were assessed with clinical measures commonly used to study dementia. The severity of the SDAT was mild in 24, moderate in 24, and severe in 18. The data from these three groups in a cross-sectional study were compared with results in our earlier study of 43 subjects enrolled with mild SDAT and followed longitudinally. We concluded that the cross-sectional method underestimates the severity of progression as indicated by some of the clinical measures. Additionally, the 24 new subjects with mild SDAT were assessed longitudinally. This replication study confirmed our earlier conclusions that four of six clinical measures showed similar patterns over time and were useful throughout the study, global measures being more informative than brief individual measures with ceiling or floor effects.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
