Abstract

Objective Sleep state misperception (SSM) is a disorder that is characterized by insomnia or excessive sleepiness without objective evidence of sleep disturbance. The cause of SSM has not yet been elucidated. This study aimed to explore sleep perception tendencies by comparing polysomnography (PSG) data and subjective sleep reports in patients with and without obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 638 participants with PSG results. We classified the participants into three groups based on their OSA severity (non-OSA, n=174; mild OSA, n=214; moderate OSA, n=250), and compared the PSG parameters and various sleep questionnaires among the groups using an analysis of variance. Additionally, we identified the rapid eye movement (REM)-related OSA and compared the variables between the REM-related OSA and non-REM-related OSA groups using independent t and chi-square tests. Results The participants with less severe OSA presented better quality and quantity of sleep in PSG (longer total sleep time, higher sleep efficiency, fewer arousals, and more deep sleep), but reported much worse sleep disturbances based on sleep questionnaires. Those with REM-related OSA showed a larger discrepancy between subjective and objective sleep. Conclusion This study found that individuals with milder OSA and REM-related OSA tended to present larger discrepancies in objective and subjective sleep states. Further research based on our preliminary findings is warranted to better recognize SSM and treat complicated sleep disorders. Keywords: Obstructive sleep apnea; Paradoxical insomnia; REM-related obstructive sleep apnea; Sleep misperception

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.