Abstract
Typically there is a positive correlation between severity of known brain injury and level of performance on neuropsychological tests, particularly tests of memory and speed of information processing. This paper will discuss in detail nine individuals who had a history of mild head injury, but who presented with significant neuropsychological deficits on testing. In each case, evidence of significant psychiatric disability and/or malingering was present and seemed to better explain the poor neuropsychological test findings than did the trauma. All nine patients showed evidence of significant premorbid stressors, an ''atypical'' response style on neuropsychological tests, and vague and unusual somatic complaints. The importance of interpreting test findings within the context of an adequate history via record review and a thorough clinical interview is stressed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.