Abstract

AbstractBackgroundMild Behavioural Impairment‐Checklist (MBI‐C) is a validated questionnaire that measures sustained later‐life emergent neuropsychiatric symptoms among people with prodromal dementia. Using this checklist as a MBI case ascertainment instrument, the prevalence of MBI was found to be 5.8% in subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and 14.2% in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). While the MBI‐C can be self‐administered or administered through a close informant via face‐to‐face or phone interviews, it is unknown whether patients and close‐informants differentially report on the MBI‐C. Here, we aim to examine the differences in self‐administered and close‐informant administered MBI‐C scores in a specialty clinic population.Method87 (25 SCD and 62 MCI) patients from the Singapore National Neuroscience Institute memory clinic completed the MBI‐C and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)4. Close‐informants completed the MBI‐C and Zarit caregiver burden scale (Zarit)5. The MBI‐C is a 34‐item questionnaire organized into five domains; 1) motivation, 2) emotional regulation, 3) impulse control, 4) social cognition, and 5) abnormal thoughts. MBI is defined by an MBI‐C total score of >6.5 in MCI 3 and a >8.5 total score in SCI2. Paired sample T‐test evaluated the difference in MBI‐C scores between patients and close‐informants. Pearson correlation test evaluated the associations between MBI‐C with GDS and Zarit scores.ResultOut of 87 participants (Mage= 67.62, SD=9.08), 29 participants were diagnosed with MBI. The frequency of MBI did not differ between SCI and MCI (40% in SCI and 30% in MCI). We found that MBI‐C domain scores did not differ significantly between patients and close‐informants (p>0.05). GDS scores positively correlated with MBI total score (p<0.01), motivation (p<0.01), emotional regulation (p<0.01), impulse control (p<0.01), social cognition (p=0.001) and abnormal thoughts (p=0.018). Zarit scores positively correlated with MBI total score (p=0.017) and impulse control (p=0.009).ConclusionMBI is common in our Asian clinic population with preclinical prodromal dementia diagnosed using the MBI‐C and was associated with greater caregiver burden and depressive symptoms. Importantly, we found that patients and their close‐informants do not report differently on the MBI‐C. Our findings suggest that both patients and close‐informants may provide reliable measures of the patient’s neuropsychiatric symptoms using the MBI‐C.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call