Abstract

This study aimed to test the usefulness and validity of two versions commonly quoted in the literature of the Milch classification of paediatric supracondylar mass fractures. Anteroposterior and lateral elbow radiographs of 10 consecutive acute paediatric lateral condylar mass fractures requiring open surgical reconstruction were presented to six observers in order to assess inter- and intraobserver reliability of both versions. Accuracy of classification was compared with intraoperative findings. Observers agreed with the operative findings in only 50% of cases. There was poor interobserver ( κ < 0.2) and moderate intraobserver agreement ( κ < 0.6) for both versions. Thus Milch's classification was not found to be a useful tool.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.