Abstract

Lebanon’s border management in times of conflict, and particularly throughout the Syrian crisis has been subject to multiple criticisms across policymakers, academics and the international community alike. Lebanon’s post-hoc approach to tackling its border management and ‘sensitive’ matters of national security, coupled with the fact that it has not signed the 1951 Refugee Convention have proven to be fundamental obstacles when it comes to the country’s maintenance of human rights standards in the areas of its treatment of various refugee populations within its borders. They have also proven to be fundamental obstacles to its management of illegal routes and illegal movement amid an escalating pandemic. In times of COVID-19, Lebanon’s lack of preparedness, its lack of coordination between its governmental institutions could mean that their border policy will once again serve as a means to hurt both sides.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.