Abstract

The article is focused on the mythologized photos of the global migration phenomena circulating in the ordinary consciousness and in the media. Authors consider deconstruction of this mythology important for two reasons. Firstly, the reproduction of negative stereotypes about migration allows the right-wing populist parties and movements to accumulate political capital, provoking new waves of anti-migration sentiments and creating a vicious circle. Secondly, these sentiments directly or indirectly influence the decision-makers. As a result, decision-making process in the field of migration regulation become influenced by irrational factors. Turning to common misconceptions about international migration, authors show that: a) the mechanical extrapolation of modern demographic trends into the distant future and causal relationship between demographic indicators and migration processes are not scientifically justified; b) there is no direct correlation between the size of the population in less developed regions and the intensity of migration flows from these regions to industrialized countries; c) international migration is by no means a one-way South - North process; d) perception of North countries migration policies, as charity, is fundamentally wrong because it doesnt take into account the complex interdependence of modern world. In addition, authors demonstrate inadequacy of the image of a migratory tsunami threatening to flood Europe.

Highlights

  • The article is focused on the mythologized photos of the global migration phenomena circulating in the ordinary consciousness and in the media

  • Decision-making process in the field of migration regulation become influenced by irrational factors

  • Turning to common misconceptions about international migration, authors show that: a) the mechanical extrapolation of modern demographic trends into the distant future and causal relationship between demographic indicators and migration processes are not scientifically justified; b) there is no direct correlation between the size of the population in less developed regions and the intensity of migration flows from these regions to industrialized countries; c) international migration is by no means a one-way “South – North” process; d) perception of “North” countries’ migration policies, as charity, is fundamentally wrong because it doesn’t take into account the complex interdependence of modern world

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Обращаясь к распространенным заблуждениям по поводу международных миграций, авторы, в частности, показывают, что: a) механическая экстраполяция современной демографической динамики на долгосрочную перспективу и вера в каузальную зависимость между демографическими показателями и миграционными процессами научно не обоснована; б) между объемами населения в регионах с низким уровнем жизни и интенсивностью миграционного оттока из этих регионов в индустриально развитые страны нет прямой связи; в) международная миграция не является однонаправленным процессом («Юг» – «Север»); г) представление о миграционной политике стран условного Севера как о благотворительности принципиально неверно, поскольку основано на игнорировании такой характеристики современного мира, как комплексная взаимозависимость . The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration 84 Prospekt Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119571, Russian Federation malakhov-vs@ranepa.ru; motin-as@ranepa.ru Соответствующие движения и партии, Malakhov V.S., Motin A.S. RUDN Journal of Political Science, 2020, 22 (3), 327–338 капитализируя антимиграционные настроения, расширяют площадку для продвижения своей повестки в парламенте и центральных СМИ.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call