Abstract

Migrants are omnipresent in cosmopolitan societies. Propelled from their homelands by poverty, violence, and environmental disasters—and the promise of better opportunities and security—migrants have found their way into metropolitan regions. At the same time, we see steep increases in economic inequality. These changes, which are intrinsically connected to the rise of neoliberal polices, have pushed immigration to the top of the political agenda for both the political right and left in many nations. The right seeks to erect walls, restrict immigration, and deport the undocumented. The left seeks amnesty, sanctuary policies and other measures to advance human rights in response to the migration crisis. Yet neither approach addresses the underlying causes of migration nor growing inequalities that together animate populist revolts on both the left and right across the globe. 
 In this paper, I employ a framework that foregrounds capitalist accumulation at the center of these processes. Focusing on urban areas in the US, I highlight the ways economic, social and political structures contribute to growing inequalities between immigrants and the native born -- as well as sharp inequalities within each group -- which, in turn, affect patterns of immigrant incorporation, politics and options for reform. The paper examines US immigration and immigrant policy, assessing their impacts on inequality and immigrant incorporation processes and outcomes. I conclude by pointing to contemporary social movements and evolving political alignments, which have the potential to achieve more egalitarian outcomes capable of sustaining social cohesion in metropolitan regions, as well as more stable and robust democratic systems across borders. Given that immigrants and their offspring comprise nearly one in four people in the U.S., addressing such inequalities is theoretically important and a pressing political concern.

Highlights

  • How do we understand patterns of immigration and growing inequalities in cosmopolitan societies? What policies might produce greater equity? This paper seeks to address these questions focusing on the U.S.Migrants are omnipresent in cosmopolitan societies

  • I employ an analytic framework that highlights structural factors that contribute to immigration patterns and growing inequities in the U.S The paper examines how U.S immigration and immigrant policy interacts with the political economy in ways that shape unequal immigrant incorporation processes and outcomes

  • Liberals celebrate immigrants’ economic contributions, advocate increased pathways to citizenship and advance human rights (Hayduk & García-Castañon 2018). Both liberals and conservatives tend to agree that immigration policy should limit ‘future flows’ of migrants, and many support ‘merit-based’ or ‘points-based’ immigration policies that limit admissions to ‘talented’ immigrants – those with higher levels of education and skills – or to temporary guest workers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Liberals celebrate immigrants’ economic contributions, advocate increased pathways to citizenship and advance human rights (Hayduk & García-Castañon 2018) Both liberals and conservatives tend to agree that immigration policy should limit ‘future flows’ of migrants, and many support ‘merit-based’ or ‘points-based’ immigration policies that limit admissions to ‘talented’ immigrants – those with higher levels of education and skills – or to temporary guest workers. Such policies, while designed to ‘promote economic growth’ and meet ‘labor needs’ of an aging population (Chishti and Bolter 2019) instead tend to exacerbate inequalities between and within migrants and citizens.. Given that immigrants and their offspring comprise nearly one in four people in the U.S, addressing these issues is theoretically important and a pressing public policy concern

Immigrant Incorporation
Immigration Policy and American Politics
Increased Enforcement
Labor Needs and Future Flows
Immigrant Policy and American Politics
Economics and Immigration Status
Findings
Challenging Structural Inequality
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call