Abstract

To compare the efficacy of mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol with misoprostol alone for pregnancy termination up to 63 days. This exploratory study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal as a part of a thesis study for a period of one year from April 2005-2006. After confirming a pregnancy < or =63 days gestation by transvaginal ultrasound, an equal number of women (50) were randomized into (i) group A, women who received 200 mg oral mifepristone (RU 486) on day 1 and vaginal misoprostol 800 microg on day 3; and (ii) group B, women who received vaginal misoprostol (800 microg) on day 1 and 3 (total dose 1600 microg). The primary study outcome measure was complete abortion without surgical intervention making comparisons between these two groups in terms of complete abortion rate, need for manual vacuum aspiration for incomplete abortion and pregnancy continuation after reconfirming the diagnosis on transvaginal ultrasound, besides comparing the side effects/complications. Fewer side effects and a more complete abortion rate (94%) was observed in group A (mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol) in comparison to vaginal misoprostol alone (total dose 1600 microg) giving a complete abortion rate of 86% along with a significant hematocrit drop on follow-up day 10 (P = 0.03) besides having increased duration of bleeding (P = 0.017). Mifepristone oral (200 mg) followed by vaginal misoprostol (800 microg) on day 3 provides a better success rate (94%) with fewer complications than vaginal misoprostol 800 microg used on days 1 and 3 for medical abortion of pregnancies up to 63 days.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.