Abstract

Abstract Unassimilated observational data, from the years 1979 to 1993, are analyzed and compared to the NCEP–NCAR reanalysis data to confirm the magnitude of the seasonal cycle in Pacific storm track activity. Such a comparison is necessary since recent publications have indicated that the reanalysis data may contain biases and spurious jumps that may affect climate signals, and eddy variance/covariance statistics are particularly sensitive to model biases, as well as changes in data coverage and quality. High-pass-filtered variance in the 250-hPa meridional wind component is taken to be the indicator of upper-tropospheric storm track intensity. Rawinsonde observations located mainly over the land masses, and aircraft observations over the oceans, both display seasonal cycles very similar to that seen in the reanalysis data. Both the midwinter suppression in Pacific storm track activity, as well as the more recent finding that the Pacific storm track is significantly stronger during the late 1980s and ea...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.