Abstract

The "leave nothing behind" strategies have been becoming a popular treatment for femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis obliterans. Atherectomy before drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty may have an advantage in improving the efficiency of drug delivery into the blood vessel wall. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic effects of directional atherectomy combined with DCB angioplasty with DCB angioplasty alone in the treatment of femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis obliterans. Patients with femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis obliterans who received endovascular therapy from June 2016 to June 2018 in our hospital and presented with life-limiting claudication or severe chronic limb ischemia comprised the study cohort. The patients were randomized to receive directional atherectomy combined with DCB angioplasty (n=45) or DCB alone (n=49). Ninety-four patients were enrolled in our study with 72 males, and the mean age was 67±10years. The mean lesion length was 112±64mm. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of patients and lesions between the 2 randomized groups (P>0.05). Flow-limiting dissections occurred more frequently in the DCB group (n=12; 24.5%) than in the DA-DCB group (n=2; 4.4%; P=0.006). The technical success rate in the DA-DCB group was superior to that in the DCB group (95.6% vs. 75.5%, P=0.006). The mean follow-up duration was 16.7±6.1months in the DCB group and 15.3±5.8months in the DA-DCB group. No amputations were performed. The overall mortality in the DCB group was 4.1% (2/49), while all patients survived in the DA-DCB group. The 12-month and 24-month primary patencies in the DA-DCB group were greater than those in the DCB group (80.5% vs. 75.7% and 67.1% vs. 55.1%, respectively); however, using all available patency data, no significant differences over time were observed (P=0.377). In this study, directional atherectomy combined with DCB angioplasty can decrease the flow-limiting dissection rate in the treatment of femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis obliterans compared with DCB angioplasty alone. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of primary patency rate which was needed to be further clarified.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call