Abstract

This study explored four middle-school mathematics teachers’ provision of non-examples and instructional explanations in teaching rational numbers to seventh-grade students. The data sources were 8 lesson hours of observations conducted in four different classrooms. Yin's [(2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage] cross-case synthesis technique was used to code the four teachers’ non-examples. Charalambous et al.'s [(2011). Prospective teachers' learning to provide instructional explanations: How does it look and what might it take? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(6), 441–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9182-z] criteria were used to code their instructional explanations. The findings showed that the four teachers seldom used non-examples of rational numbers in their classrooms and provided low-quality instructional explanations to their students. The implications for improving teachers’ provision of non-examples and instructional explanations are discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.