Abstract

This paper studies the existence of middle-income growth traps in a two-period overlapping generations model of economic growth with two types of labor and endogenous occupational choices. It also distinguishes between “basic” and “advanced” infrastructure, with the latter promoting design activities, and accounts for a knowledge network externality associated with product diversification. Multiple steady-state equilibria may emerge, one of them taking the form of a low-growth trap characterized by low productivity growth and a misallocation of talent—defined as a relatively low share of high-ability workers in design activities. Improved access to advanced infrastructure may help to escape from that trap. The implications of other public policies, including the protection of property rights and labor market reforms, are also discussed.

Highlights

  • Since the 1950s, rapid growth has allowed a significant number of countries to achieve middle-income status

  • The key result that we are able to establish is that if the marginal benefits associated with nonrival knowledge depends in a nonlinear fashion on the share of the population involved in design activities, as a result of a knowledge network effect, multiple equilibria may emerge, one of them being synonymous with a middle-income trap

  • We show that escaping from that trap may be achieved by a sufficiently large increase in investment in advanced infrastructure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the 1950s, rapid growth has allowed a significant number of countries to achieve middle-income status. This paper offers an alternative view on the cause of a middle-income trap It fundamentally agrees on productivity slowdowns as being a source of these traps, it differs from the existing literature in terms of the reasons why productivity growth may be constrained, and what type of public policies can be implemented to promote a broad-based innovation strategy and escape a middle-income trap. The key result that we are able to establish is that if the marginal benefits associated with nonrival (disembodied) knowledge depends in a nonlinear fashion on the share of the population involved in design activities (being high for a range of values for that share), as a result of a knowledge network effect, multiple equilibria may emerge, one of them (the lower-growth equilibrium) being synonymous with a middle-income trap.

The Model
Individuals
Production of the Final Good
Production of Intermediate Goods
Design Sector
Government
Market-Clearing Condition and Labor Supply
Equilibrium
Properties of Equilibrium
Middle-Income Trap and Public Policy
Extensions
Enforcement of Property Rights
Infrastructure and Time Allocation
Labor Market Rigidities
Policy Implications
Findings
Concluding Remarks

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.