Abstract

BackgroundRheumatic heart disease (RHD) is still a concerning issue in developing countries. Among delayed RHD presentations, rheumatic mitral valve stenosis (MS) remains a prevalent finding. Percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy (PTMC) is the intervention of choice for severe mitral stenosis (MS). We aimed to assess the mid-term outcome of PTMC in patients with immediate success.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, out of 220 patients who had undergone successful PTMC between 2006 and 2018, the clinical course of 186 patients could be successfully followed. Cardiac-related death, undergoing a second PTMC or mitral valve replacement (MVR) were considered adverse cardiac events for the purpose of this study. In order to find significant factors related to adverse cardiac outcomes, peri-procedural data for the studied patients were collected.The patients were also contacted to find out their current clinical status and whether they had continued secondary antibiotic prophylaxis regimen or not. Those who had not suffered from the adverse cardiac events were additionally asked to undergo echocardiographic imaging, in order to assess the prevalence of mitral valve restenosis, defined as mitral valve area (MVA) < 1.5 cm2 and loss of ≥ 50% of initial area gain.ResultsDuring the mean follow-up time of 5.69 ± 3.24 years, 31 patients (16.6% of patients) had suffered from adverse cardiac events. Atrial fibrillation rhythm (p = 0.003, HR = 3.659), Wilkins echocardiographic score > 8 (p = 0.028, HR = 2.320) and higher pre-procedural systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (p = 0.021, HR = 1.031) were three independent predictors of adverse events and immediate post-PTMC mitral valve area (IMVA) ≥ 2 cm2 (p < 0.001, HR = 0.06) was the significant predictor of event-free outcome. Additionally, follow-up echocardiographic imaging detected mitral restenosis in 44 patients (23.6% of all patients). The only statistically significant protective factor against restenosis was again IMVA ≥ 2 cm2 (p = 0.001, OR = 0.240).ConclusionThe mid-term results of PTMC are multifactorial and may be influenced by heterogeneous peri-procedural determinants. IMVA had a great impact on the long-term success of this procedure. Continuing secondary antibiotic prophylaxis was not a protective factor against adverse cardiac events in this study. (clinicaltrial.gov registration: NCT04112108).

Highlights

  • Rheumatic heart disease (RHD), despite the decrease in its prevalence in some parts of the world, continues to be a major medical concern in developing countries [1, 2]

  • immediate post-PTMC mitral valve area (IMVA) had a great impact on the long-term success of this procedure

  • It is worthy of note that aside from 220 cases included in this study, based on our database, the rate of early complications in our centers was around 6% (14 patients)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD), despite the decrease in its prevalence in some parts of the world, continues to be a major medical concern in developing countries [1, 2]. Among delayed RHD presentations, rheumatic mitral valve stenosis remains a common finding. It accounts for the great majority of all cases of mitral stenosis (MS) even in developed nations [3, 4]. The immediate success rate of PTMC is relatively the same as that of surgical commissurotomy techniques, the long-term results and appropriate patient selection for this procedure remain debatable [7, 8]. Because of differences among trials in study design, the criteria and techniques used, and the duration of follow-up, the success rate and the reported predictive factors have not been always similar. Among delayed RHD presentations, rheumatic mitral valve stenosis (MS) remains a prevalent finding. We aimed to assess the midterm outcome of PTMC in patients with immediate success

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call