Abstract

Mid-Spatial Frequency (MSF) Wavefront Error of optics divided into the PSD-1 and PSD-2 ranges plays an important role in the performance of high power laser systems. The present work focuses on the PSD-2 range in terms of short ripples which haven’t been well studied in the literature. Characteristics and origins of these short ripples were detailed, whereafter small tool computer controlled polishing (CCP) and conventional full aperture polishing experiments were conducted on fused silica. It is revealed that PSD2 error is independent of the main process parameters including lap rotating rate and polishing pressure in continuous polishing and tool path pitch and crossfeed velocity in small tool CCP processes. Whereas the type of polishing lap has a decisive effect on PSD2 error of the optics. The pitch lap shows superiority in restraint of short ripples over polyurethane pad. By introducing diamond conditioner for dressing polyurethane pad, the PSD2 error has been greatly decreased.

Highlights

  • The wavefront quality of the optics used in high power lasers is specified over a continuous range of spatial frequencies from 1×102 to 2.5×10−3 mm−1 [1]

  • It is well known that the power spectral density (PSD)-1 error, in terms of long ripples, is intensively correlative to computer controlled polishing (CCP) processes characterized by a small tool [5]

  • It is revealed that the Rms values over the PSD-2 range keeps at ~0.72 nm for variable polishing pressures

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The wavefront quality of the optics used in high power lasers is specified over a continuous range of spatial frequencies from 1×102 to 2.5×10−3 mm−1 [1]. It is well known that the PSD-1 error, in terms of long ripples (i.e., waves), is intensively correlative to CCP processes characterized by a small tool [5]. This error is mainly affected by the initial surface error distribution (spatial and frequency domain), the removal function characters (profile, removal efficiency and stability) and the adopted paths [6, 7]. PSD-2 error of these prepared fuse silica have been measured and analyzed

PLISHING EXPERIMENTS AND PSD2 MEASUREMENT
RESULTS
Effect of process parameters on PSD2 error
Effect of lap type on PSD2 error
CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.