Abstract

Thermal ablation (TA) with radiofrequency (RFA) or cryoablation (CA) are established treatments for small renal masses (≤4 cm). Microwave ablation (MWA) has several potential benefits (decreased ablation time, less susceptibility to heat-sink, higher lesion temperatures than RFA) but is still considered experimental considering the available small-sample studies with short follow-up. To evaluate technique efficacy and complications of our initial experience of renal tumors treated using percutaneous MWA with a curative intent. A total of 105 renal tumors (in 93 patients) were treated between April 2014 and August 2017. MWA was performed percutaneously with computed tomography (CT) guidance under conscious sedation (n=82) or full anesthesia. Patients were followed with contrast-enhanced CT scans at six months and yearly thereafter for a minimum of five years. The mean follow-up time was 2.1 years. The percentage of tumors completely ablated in a single session (primary efficacy rate) and those successfully treated after repeat ablation (secondary efficacy rate) were recorded. Patient and tumor characteristics as well as complications were collected retrospectively. The median patient age was 70 years and median tumor size was 25 mm. Primary efficacy rate was 96.2% (101/105 tumors). After including two residual tumors for a second ablation session, secondary efficacy was 97.1% (102/105). Periprocedural complications were found in 5.2% (5/95) sessions: four Clavien-Dindo I and one Clavien-Dindo IIIa. One postprocedural Clavien-Dindo II complication was found. MWA has high efficacy rates and few complications compared to other TA methods at a mean follow-up of two years.

Highlights

  • Invasive image-guided thermal ablation (TA) is an established treatment option for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) [1,2]

  • Patients selected for Microwave ablation (MWA) treatment were those with renal tumors, T1a, solitary kidney, impaired renal function, bilateral tumors, and/or predisposition for developing multiple tumors

  • All of the four tumors not completely ablated in a single session were clear-cell RCC

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Invasive image-guided thermal ablation (TA) is an established treatment option for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) [1,2]. Increasing evidence [1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] suggests comparable oncological outcomes for partial nephrectomy (PN), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and cryoablation (CA) in the treatment of T1a renal tumors. MWA is suggested to achieve higher intra-lesion temperatures, larger ablation zones, and to be less susceptible to heat-sink effect than RFA [14,15]. Microwave ablation (MWA) has several potential benefits (decreased ablation time, less susceptibility to heat-sink, higher lesion temperatures than RFA) but is still considered experimental considering the available small-sample studies with short follow-up. Purpose: To evaluate technique efficacy and complications of our initial experience of renal tumors treated using percutaneous MWA with a curative intent. Conclusion: MWA has high efficacy rates and few complications compared to other TA methods at a mean follow-up of two years

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call