Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives systems compared in different dentin regions (central-CD or proximal-PD) in a class II cavity configuration. A class II (mesial-oclusal-distal) cavity configuration was simulated on 20 extracted human third-molars (4 mm wide/3 mm deep). Etch-and-rinse adhesive (Scotchbond Multi Purpose, n=5, SBMP and Optibond FL, n=5, OPFL) and self-etch adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond, n=5, CSE and Optibond XTR, n=5, OPXTR) were applied. Class II restorations were performed by incremental technique and photo-activated (Bluephase/G2). Samples were sectioned to beam shape (1 mm² cross-section), placed on Geraldeli's device for µTBS test (0.5 mm/min cross-head speed). Fracture patterns were analyzed on stereomicroscope and classified as cohesive-resin, adhesive, mixed/resin or mixed/dentin. Samples (n=4) were prepared for scanning electron microscope observation. Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA with Split-Plot arrangement and Tukey's test (α=0.05). There were no statistically significant differences among SBMP, OPFL, CSE and OPXTR on CD (p>0.05). However, on PD for SBMP and OPFL, µTBS values were significantly lower compared to CSE and OPXTR (p<0.05). In all groups, mixed failure pattern was more frequently observed, except for SBMP/CD (adhesive). In class II type cavity configuration, PD location negatively influenced bond strength of etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Opposite to self-etching adhesives, which presented higher bond strength values compared to etch-and-rinse adhesives in PD.

Highlights

  • Modern restorative dentistry relies broadly on bonding the restorative materials to the tooth hard tissues

  • The bond strength achieved by any dentin bonding agent at any dentin depth is correlated with

  • Three aspects: the area available for surface adhesion, the area occupied by resin tags and the area of intertubular dentin infiltrated by resin adhesives (10)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Modern restorative dentistry relies broadly on bonding the restorative materials to the tooth hard tissues. Since dentin is an anisotropic substrate, bond strength achieved in the adhesive layer connecting restorative materials and dentin structure is affected by dentin tubules orientation, tubule densities and the proportion of intratubular and intertubular dentin (2,3). It is known that these tubules are originated from odontoblast cell tracks from dentin-enamel junction (DEJ) or cementum to pulp chamber (2). Each one of these dentin tubules has a varying radius and an almost straight or slightly wave-like pattern, which penetrates into dentin (4). Dentin tubules are approximately parallel in the root part of the tooth, but are obviously radial in the peripheral crown region (4)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call