Abstract
Chronic degradation of hybrid layer collagen by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) jeopardizes resin-dentin interfacial integrity and limits the durability of dental restorations. The 4-point bending strength (BS) is a valid but uncommon method of testing the mechanical behavior of resin-dentin interfaces. The present study aims to analyze the influence of two matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors on microtensile bond strength (µTBS), BS and nanoleakage. A total of 48M were divided into three groups according to bonding procedure. Teeth were horizontally sectioned to produce a flat dentin surface. In the control group, etch-and-rinse Prime&Bond One (Dentsply) bonding was used; in the self-etch group, methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB)-containing Clearfil SE Protect (Kuraray) was used; and in the benzalkonium chloride (BAC)-etch group, BAC-etchant (Bisco) was used. A Ceram.X-One (Dentsply) composite was built as three successive layers and was light-cured. Samples were sectioned to produce microrods that were randomly divided into two groups for analysis at baseline and after 6 months of water immersion (n = 32), plus one slab for nanoleakage analysis (n = 8) via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and digital image analysis (Fiji). Data were analyzed using the Weibull distribution and a mixed-model ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey test. All groups showed deterioration of the initial bonds. The self-etch group had a worse baseline µTBS than the control but had the best BS after aging. BAC-etch did not improve bond stability of etch-and-rinse adhesive. The µTBS and BS test results after aging were moderately correlated. Mixed fractures prevailed with regard to µTBS, whereas adhesive fractures dominated with regard to BS. Nanoleakage was not eliminated in any group and increased after aging. MDPB self-etch resisted bond degradation better than etch-and-rinse adhesives, even after BAC-etching. Integrating BS in studies of µTBS and nanoleakage might provide more clinically relevant outcomes for predicting the performance of dental adhesives.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.