Microsurgical approaches to the pulvinar: A comparative analysis

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the area of exposure to the cisternal thalamus associated with four surgical techniques: supracerebellar-infratentorial (SCIT), occipital interhemispheric (OI), transchoroidal (TC) and subtemporal before and after parahippocampal resection (ST and STh, respectively). MethodsAll approaches were performed on both sides of three heads. Qualitative anatomical analyses were performed to understand anatomical limits, advantages, and flaws of each technique. Quantitative analyses for multiple repeated dependent variables assessed significant differences between areas of exposure. ResultsExposure area was significantly more extensive using TC and STh approaches compared to ST, OI, and SCIT. STh achieved a significantly wider exposure compared to ST. Regarding dissection angle, surrounding structures and limitations, ST approaches do not provide adequate exposure, nor alignment with the thalamic axis. The OI and STh may provide a better field of exposure, but without adequate alignment and challenging deeper dissections. TC provides better exposure of the cisternal pulvinar with access to lateral pulvinar at the atrium’s anterior wall but is a transcortical route that disrupts non-pathological tissue. SCIT provides an adequate area of exposure with the possibility of alignment with the thalamus axis, thus allowing an easier dissection of deeper lesions. ConclusionsFor lesions at the pulvinar surface, OI and STh are adequate. For lesions restricted to medial pulvinar and deep along the thalamus axis, SCIT approaches are recommended. Lesions extending to the lateral pulvinar and ventricular atrium are best removed through TC approaches. The ST approach was not suitable to the cisternal pulvinar due to its limited angular exposure.