Abstract

The composition of an Al–Cu–Mg ternary eutectic alloy was chosen to be Al–30 wt% Cu–6 wt % Mg to have the Al2Cu and Al2CuMg solid phases within an aluminum matrix (α-Al) after its solidification from the melt. The alloy Al–30 wt % Cu–6 wt % Mg was directionally solidified at a constant temperature gradient (G = 8.55 K/mm) with different growth rates V, from 9.43 to 173.3 μm/s, by using a Bridgman-type furnace. The lamellar eutectic spacings (λE) were measured from transverse sections of the samples. The functional dependencies of lamellar spacings λE ( $${\lambda _{A{l_2}CuMg}}$$ and $${\lambda _{A{l_2}Cu}}$$ in μm), microhardness H V (in kg/mm2), tensile strength σT (in MPa), and electrical resistivity ρ (in Ω m) on the growth rate V (in μm/s) were obtained as $${\lambda _{A{l_2}CuMg}} = 3.05{V^{ - 0.31}}$$ , $${\lambda _{A{l_2}Cu}} = 6.35{V^{ - 0.35}}$$ , $${H_V} = 308.3{\left( V \right)^{ - 0.33}}$$ ; σT= 408.6(V)0.14, and ρ = 28.82 × 10–8(V)0.11, respectively for the Al–Cu–Mg eutectic alloy. The bulk growth rates were determined as $$\lambda _{A{l_2}CuMg}^2V = 93.2$$ and $$\lambda _{A{l_2}Cu}^2V = 195.76$$ by using the measured values of $${\lambda _{A{l_2}CuMg}}$$ , $${\lambda _{A{l_2}Cu}}$$ and V. A comparison of present results was also made with the previous similar experimental results.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.